<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 16 - Gujarat High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216172</link>
    <description>The court upheld the validity of the notice issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for reopening the assessment. It found that the reasons were recorded before issuing the notice, rejecting the argument that the Assessing Officer lacked jurisdiction. The court also allowed the use of section 147 to reopen the assessment, emphasizing the requirement of having a &quot;reason to believe&quot; that income had escaped assessment. Despite some reasons being for verification purposes, the court deemed two reasons valid, including deduction claims and warranty expenses, permitting the assessment to be reopened. The petition was dismissed, and interim relief was vacated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2013 16:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189555" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 16 - Gujarat High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216172</link>
      <description>The court upheld the validity of the notice issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for reopening the assessment. It found that the reasons were recorded before issuing the notice, rejecting the argument that the Assessing Officer lacked jurisdiction. The court also allowed the use of section 147 to reopen the assessment, emphasizing the requirement of having a &quot;reason to believe&quot; that income had escaped assessment. Despite some reasons being for verification purposes, the court deemed two reasons valid, including deduction claims and warranty expenses, permitting the assessment to be reopened. The petition was dismissed, and interim relief was vacated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216172</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>