<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 8 - ITAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216164</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee for statistical purposes, granting an opportunity to present additional evidence and clarify the disputed expenses and credits attributed to Shri Phaniraj Rama Rao. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of cooperation with the Assessing Officer and ordered a reevaluation of the matter for a fair assessment, recognizing the need for conclusive proof to differentiate between revenue and capital expenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 17:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189548" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 8 - ITAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216164</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee for statistical purposes, granting an opportunity to present additional evidence and clarify the disputed expenses and credits attributed to Shri Phaniraj Rama Rao. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of cooperation with the Assessing Officer and ordered a reevaluation of the matter for a fair assessment, recognizing the need for conclusive proof to differentiate between revenue and capital expenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216164</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>