<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 4 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216152</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madras analyzed regulations for granting licenses to act as Customs House Agents under the 1984 and 2004 Regulations. The Court determined that candidates who passed examinations under the 1984 Regulations were eligible for licenses under the 2004 Regulations. It found Public Notices dated 20.06.2003 and 24.02.2005 invalid and criticized the Division Bench&#039;s limitations on licenses based on the 1984 Regulations. The Court held that the 2004 Regulations operate prospectively and upheld the Single Judge&#039;s decision to grant licenses under the 2004 Regulations, overturning the Division Bench&#039;s modification. The writ petition was allowed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2012 12:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189536" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 4 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216152</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madras analyzed regulations for granting licenses to act as Customs House Agents under the 1984 and 2004 Regulations. The Court determined that candidates who passed examinations under the 1984 Regulations were eligible for licenses under the 2004 Regulations. It found Public Notices dated 20.06.2003 and 24.02.2005 invalid and criticized the Division Bench&#039;s limitations on licenses based on the 1984 Regulations. The Court held that the 2004 Regulations operate prospectively and upheld the Single Judge&#039;s decision to grant licenses under the 2004 Regulations, overturning the Division Bench&#039;s modification. The writ petition was allowed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216152</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>