<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 3 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216151</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the stay petition, setting aside the impugned order and remitting the matter back to the adjudicating authority for reconsideration. The denial of cenvat credit due to the lack of original bill of entry and incorrect address on bills of entry was at the core of the case. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of following natural justice principles and directed the adjudicating authority to reexamine the matter, keeping all issues open for further consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 13:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189535" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 3 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216151</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the stay petition, setting aside the impugned order and remitting the matter back to the adjudicating authority for reconsideration. The denial of cenvat credit due to the lack of original bill of entry and incorrect address on bills of entry was at the core of the case. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of following natural justice principles and directed the adjudicating authority to reexamine the matter, keeping all issues open for further consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216151</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>