<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 808 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216138</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s argument against the acceptance of fresh evidence, finding no merit in the case. Regarding the computation of long-term capital gains, the Tribunal held that section 50C applies to the transfers in question, and the value determined by the Stamp Valuation Authority should be used for calculating capital gains. The Tribunal partially allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the decision of the CIT(A) in granting relief to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2012 15:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189522" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 808 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216138</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s argument against the acceptance of fresh evidence, finding no merit in the case. Regarding the computation of long-term capital gains, the Tribunal held that section 50C applies to the transfers in question, and the value determined by the Stamp Valuation Authority should be used for calculating capital gains. The Tribunal partially allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the decision of the CIT(A) in granting relief to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216138</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>