<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 793 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216123</link>
    <description>Imported raw materials sent by a manufacturer-exporter to a job worker for conversion were prima facie not shown to be a prohibited transfer under the exemption notifications. The materials referred to a foreign trade public notice recognising conversion through a job worker and treating only sale of the imported goods before conversion as a breach of the actual user condition. On the record, the goods were sold only after conversion, and the notification language regarding supporting manufacturers for merchant exporters did not justify reading a bar against a manufacturer-exporter using a job worker. The Tribunal&#039;s assumption was therefore not sustainable at the pre-deposit stage, and the pre-deposit direction was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 17:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189507" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 793 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216123</link>
      <description>Imported raw materials sent by a manufacturer-exporter to a job worker for conversion were prima facie not shown to be a prohibited transfer under the exemption notifications. The materials referred to a foreign trade public notice recognising conversion through a job worker and treating only sale of the imported goods before conversion as a breach of the actual user condition. On the record, the goods were sold only after conversion, and the notification language regarding supporting manufacturers for merchant exporters did not justify reading a bar against a manufacturer-exporter using a job worker. The Tribunal&#039;s assumption was therefore not sustainable at the pre-deposit stage, and the pre-deposit direction was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216123</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>