<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (5) TMI 461 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216114</link>
    <description>Slagwool and rockwool were classified under Central Excise Tariff sub-heading 6807.10 because a Larger Bench decision had already settled that classification and had attained finality. That binding position displaced the contrary Tribunal view under sub-heading 6803.00, and the court did not examine limitation once the classification issue was resolved. The impugned Tribunal order was set aside and the assessee succeeded on the merits of classification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2012 18:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189498" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (5) TMI 461 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216114</link>
      <description>Slagwool and rockwool were classified under Central Excise Tariff sub-heading 6807.10 because a Larger Bench decision had already settled that classification and had attained finality. That binding position displaced the contrary Tribunal view under sub-heading 6803.00, and the court did not examine limitation once the classification issue was resolved. The impugned Tribunal order was set aside and the assessee succeeded on the merits of classification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216114</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>