https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216112 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad considered the issue of penalty under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant's penalty under Section 76 was found unsustainable as they promptly paid the service tax, interest, and penalty under Section 78, and did not contest the penalty under Section 77. The Tribunal confirmed the demand for service tax, penalty under Section 77, interest on service tax, and the penalty already deposited under Section 78. en-us Fri, 13 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Sep 2012 15:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216112 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad considered the issue of penalty under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant's penalty under Section 76 was found unsustainable as they promptly paid the service tax, interest, and penalty under Section 78, and did not contest the penalty under Section 77. The Tribunal confirmed the demand for service tax, penalty under Section 77, interest on service tax, and the penalty already deposited under Section 78. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 13 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216112