<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 763 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216089</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty under section 271(1)(c) for Assessment Year 2007-08. It found that the appellant had disclosed the consideration in the year of receipt, negating any intention to conceal income. Relying on relevant case law, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing that penalty proceedings should not automatically imply concealment, especially when disclosure was made in the original return.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 May 2013 15:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189473" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 763 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216089</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty under section 271(1)(c) for Assessment Year 2007-08. It found that the appellant had disclosed the consideration in the year of receipt, negating any intention to conceal income. Relying on relevant case law, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing that penalty proceedings should not automatically imply concealment, especially when disclosure was made in the original return.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216089</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>