<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 761 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216087</link>
    <description>Imported digital multifunction print and copying machines were treated as neither hazardous waste nor restricted goods under Rule 3(1)(iii) of the Hazardous Waste (Management, Handling and Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2008, so withholding release on that basis was not justified. The order follows earlier connected writ petitions and permits customs authorities to require inspection by authorised chartered engineers before release where such inspection has not been carried out, with release thereafter on payment of applicable customs duty and compliance with lawful conditions. It also preserves the petitioners&#039; liberty to seek waiver of detention and demurrage charges under the cargo handling regulations. The goods were directed to be released on similar terms as in the earlier order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 10:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189471" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 761 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216087</link>
      <description>Imported digital multifunction print and copying machines were treated as neither hazardous waste nor restricted goods under Rule 3(1)(iii) of the Hazardous Waste (Management, Handling and Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2008, so withholding release on that basis was not justified. The order follows earlier connected writ petitions and permits customs authorities to require inspection by authorised chartered engineers before release where such inspection has not been carried out, with release thereafter on payment of applicable customs duty and compliance with lawful conditions. It also preserves the petitioners&#039; liberty to seek waiver of detention and demurrage charges under the cargo handling regulations. The goods were directed to be released on similar terms as in the earlier order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216087</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>