https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216086 The Court set aside the suspension of the CHA license, ruling in favor of the appellant. It found that the suspension order was issued without following the prescribed procedures outlined in the CHALR, specifically Regulations 20, 21, and 22. The Court emphasized the necessity of conducting a full inquiry after any immediate suspension under Regulation 20(2) and directed the authorities to proceed with the inquiry in compliance with the law. This decision underscores the importance of adhering to regulatory requirements for the suspension or revocation of CHA licenses to uphold procedural fairness and legal standards. en-us Mon, 30 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 11 Oct 2012 13:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216086 The Court set aside the suspension of the CHA license, ruling in favor of the appellant. It found that the suspension order was issued without following the prescribed procedures outlined in the CHALR, specifically Regulations 20, 21, and 22. The Court emphasized the necessity of conducting a full inquiry after any immediate suspension under Regulation 20(2) and directed the authorities to proceed with the inquiry in compliance with the law. This decision underscores the importance of adhering to regulatory requirements for the suspension or revocation of CHA licenses to uphold procedural fairness and legal standards. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 30 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216086