<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 748 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216073</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the original adjudicating authority to reconsider the appellant&#039;s claim for duty exemption under the EPCG scheme in accordance with the issued license and then evaluate the refund claim on its merits. The appeal was allowed by way of remand, emphasizing the importance of considering the appellant&#039;s claim for reassessment and refund based on the EPCG scheme eligibility.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 22:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189457" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 748 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216073</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the original adjudicating authority to reconsider the appellant&#039;s claim for duty exemption under the EPCG scheme in accordance with the issued license and then evaluate the refund claim on its merits. The appeal was allowed by way of remand, emphasizing the importance of considering the appellant&#039;s claim for reassessment and refund based on the EPCG scheme eligibility.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216073</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>