<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 739 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216064</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Authority on Advance Ruling&#039;s interpretation that once a return is filed, all potential questions fall within the assessing authority&#039;s jurisdiction, thereby ousting the AAR&#039;s jurisdiction under Section 245R(2) of the Income Tax Act. The court rejected the petitions, emphasizing that no practice inconsistent with statutory provisions can be pursued, reinforcing the AAR&#039;s jurisdictional bar.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Oct 2013 13:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189448" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 739 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216064</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Authority on Advance Ruling&#039;s interpretation that once a return is filed, all potential questions fall within the assessing authority&#039;s jurisdiction, thereby ousting the AAR&#039;s jurisdiction under Section 245R(2) of the Income Tax Act. The court rejected the petitions, emphasizing that no practice inconsistent with statutory provisions can be pursued, reinforcing the AAR&#039;s jurisdictional bar.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216064</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>