<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 728 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216053</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the assessee exemption under Section 11 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It held that the loans given were not investments or deposits, thus not violating Section 13(1)(d). Emphasizing consistency, the tribunal noted no disallowance in prior or subsequent years for similar transactions. The Assessing Officer&#039;s denial of exemption was deemed unjustified, directing the AO to provide the exemption under Section 11.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2016 15:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189437" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 728 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216053</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the assessee exemption under Section 11 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It held that the loans given were not investments or deposits, thus not violating Section 13(1)(d). Emphasizing consistency, the tribunal noted no disallowance in prior or subsequent years for similar transactions. The Assessing Officer&#039;s denial of exemption was deemed unjustified, directing the AO to provide the exemption under Section 11.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216053</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>