<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 724 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216049</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the decision of the Joint Secretary to reject the Revenue&#039;s revision application challenging the allowance of interest on the sanctioned rebate claim under Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act 1944. The Court found that the Revenue&#039;s contentions lacked merit as the rebate claim was paid within three months of sanctioning, similar to a previous case cited. The writ petition was dismissed, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2013 11:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189433" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 724 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216049</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the decision of the Joint Secretary to reject the Revenue&#039;s revision application challenging the allowance of interest on the sanctioned rebate claim under Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act 1944. The Court found that the Revenue&#039;s contentions lacked merit as the rebate claim was paid within three months of sanctioning, similar to a previous case cited. The writ petition was dismissed, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216049</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>