https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216044 The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the appellants for contravening Rule 9(2) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 by not mentioning vehicle details on invoices. The Tribunal found that since the goods were physically received by the appellants and were not liable for confiscation, the penalty under Rule 15(1) was deemed inapplicable. Rule 9(2) allows for non-mention of vehicle details in such cases, absolving the appellants of contravention. The appeal was allowed, and the penalty was set aside. en-us Tue, 13 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Aug 2012 15:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216044 The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the appellants for contravening Rule 9(2) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 by not mentioning vehicle details on invoices. The Tribunal found that since the goods were physically received by the appellants and were not liable for confiscation, the penalty under Rule 15(1) was deemed inapplicable. Rule 9(2) allows for non-mention of vehicle details in such cases, absolving the appellants of contravention. The appeal was allowed, and the penalty was set aside. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 13 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216044