https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216010 The case involved challenges to rebate claim rejection under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, due to mis-declaration of raw material and delay in filing. The Government found discrepancies in raw material declaration and manufacturing process, leading to the rejection of rebate claims. The mis-declaration of raw material and failure to disclose material used in manufacturing rendered the rebate inadmissible. The impugned orders were set aside, emphasizing the importance of accurate disclosure and compliance with procedural requirements for claiming rebate benefits. en-us Thu, 03 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Aug 2012 15:38:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216010 The case involved challenges to rebate claim rejection under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, due to mis-declaration of raw material and delay in filing. The Government found discrepancies in raw material declaration and manufacturing process, leading to the rejection of rebate claims. The mis-declaration of raw material and failure to disclose material used in manufacturing rendered the rebate inadmissible. The impugned orders were set aside, emphasizing the importance of accurate disclosure and compliance with procedural requirements for claiming rebate benefits. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 03 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216010