<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 687 - CESTAT, New Delhi</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216008</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellants, finding that their service was more aligned with &quot;Public Relation Service&quot; rather than &quot;Management Consultancy Service.&quot; The demand for tax on reimbursable expenses was deemed not maintainable, leading to a waiver of the pre-deposit requirement for the appeal. The Appellants&#039; request for a change in their registration certificate was accepted, and the tax paid before 1.5.2006 was considered unnecessary. The Tribunal granted a waiver of pre-deposit and ordered a stay on the collection of dues, allowing the Appellants to challenge the order without immediate financial burden.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 16:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189392" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 687 - CESTAT, New Delhi</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216008</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellants, finding that their service was more aligned with &quot;Public Relation Service&quot; rather than &quot;Management Consultancy Service.&quot; The demand for tax on reimbursable expenses was deemed not maintainable, leading to a waiver of the pre-deposit requirement for the appeal. The Appellants&#039; request for a change in their registration certificate was accepted, and the tax paid before 1.5.2006 was considered unnecessary. The Tribunal granted a waiver of pre-deposit and ordered a stay on the collection of dues, allowing the Appellants to challenge the order without immediate financial burden.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216008</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>