<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 684 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216005</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the appellant&#039;s eligibility for credit on service tax paid on &#039;Group Health Insurance&#039; based on precedent. However, regarding &#039;Transit Insurance&#039;, the judge ordered further verification and quantification, remanding the matter to the original authority. The penalty imposed on the appellant was waived due to the arguable nature of the issues and existing coverage of the &#039;Group Health Insurance&#039; matter by decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 20:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189389" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 684 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216005</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the appellant&#039;s eligibility for credit on service tax paid on &#039;Group Health Insurance&#039; based on precedent. However, regarding &#039;Transit Insurance&#039;, the judge ordered further verification and quantification, remanding the matter to the original authority. The penalty imposed on the appellant was waived due to the arguable nature of the issues and existing coverage of the &#039;Group Health Insurance&#039; matter by decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216005</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>