<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 671 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215992</link>
    <description>The court set aside the order for pre-emptive purchase under section 269UD (1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, regarding a property in East of Kailash, New Delhi. The court found that the difference in apparent consideration between the property in question and a comparable property was below the 15% threshold required for such a purchase. The court also noted that comparing properties with significant size differences could lead to misleading conclusions. As a result, the writ petitions were allowed, and no costs were awarded in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2012 18:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189376" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 671 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215992</link>
      <description>The court set aside the order for pre-emptive purchase under section 269UD (1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, regarding a property in East of Kailash, New Delhi. The court found that the difference in apparent consideration between the property in question and a comparable property was below the 15% threshold required for such a purchase. The court also noted that comparing properties with significant size differences could lead to misleading conclusions. As a result, the writ petitions were allowed, and no costs were awarded in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215992</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>