<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 667 - CHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215988</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the Income Tax Appeal as it did not involve any substantial question of law. The Court found the question framed lacked specificity and did not challenge specific findings of the Tribunal, Assessing Officer, or Commissioner of Appeals. Consequently, the appeal was deemed unanswerable and redundant, leading to its dismissal without costs incurred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 10:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189372" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 667 - CHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215988</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the Income Tax Appeal as it did not involve any substantial question of law. The Court found the question framed lacked specificity and did not challenge specific findings of the Tribunal, Assessing Officer, or Commissioner of Appeals. Consequently, the appeal was deemed unanswerable and redundant, leading to its dismissal without costs incurred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215988</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>