<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 663 - ITAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215984</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision regarding the nature of royalty payment, determining 25% as capital expenditure and 75% as revenue expenditure. It directed a reasonable estimation of expenses for disallowance under section 14A and allowed the deduction under section 43B for employees&#039; contribution to Provident Fund if paid before the return filing due date. Both the assessee&#039;s and the Department&#039;s appeals were partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 May 2013 15:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189368" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 663 - ITAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215984</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision regarding the nature of royalty payment, determining 25% as capital expenditure and 75% as revenue expenditure. It directed a reasonable estimation of expenses for disallowance under section 14A and allowed the deduction under section 43B for employees&#039; contribution to Provident Fund if paid before the return filing due date. Both the assessee&#039;s and the Department&#039;s appeals were partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215984</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>