<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 657 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215978</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of the product, Polyurethane Moulded Foam Seat Cushion, under Chapter 39 due to its use in manufacturing vehicle cushions. Regarding the stay of demand, the Tribunal directed the deposit of 60% of the duty amount within 10 weeks, with a waiver of the remaining duty, interest, and penalties until the appeal&#039;s disposal. The Tribunal found the imposition of penalties on both the firm and partners impermissible, directing partial deposit of the duty amount and waiving the rest until the resolution of the appeal. Compliance was required within a specified deadline, and the applications were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 20:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189362" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 657 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215978</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of the product, Polyurethane Moulded Foam Seat Cushion, under Chapter 39 due to its use in manufacturing vehicle cushions. Regarding the stay of demand, the Tribunal directed the deposit of 60% of the duty amount within 10 weeks, with a waiver of the remaining duty, interest, and penalties until the appeal&#039;s disposal. The Tribunal found the imposition of penalties on both the firm and partners impermissible, directing partial deposit of the duty amount and waiving the rest until the resolution of the appeal. Compliance was required within a specified deadline, and the applications were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215978</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>