<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 650 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215968</link>
    <description>Delayed supply of information under the Right to Information Act, 2005 can justify statutory penalty where the requested material is furnished only after substantial delay. The Delhi High Court held that the penalty imposed at the prescribed rate for the period of delay was sustainable because complete information reached the applicant only after more than 100 days, and the absence of a first appeal did not negate the consequence of the delay. The challenge therefore failed, the penalty order was upheld, and the petition was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 19:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189352" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 650 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215968</link>
      <description>Delayed supply of information under the Right to Information Act, 2005 can justify statutory penalty where the requested material is furnished only after substantial delay. The Delhi High Court held that the penalty imposed at the prescribed rate for the period of delay was sustainable because complete information reached the applicant only after more than 100 days, and the absence of a first appeal did not negate the consequence of the delay. The challenge therefore failed, the penalty order was upheld, and the petition was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215968</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>