https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215944 The Revenue's appeal was allowed, and the cross-objection was dismissed. The Tribunal held M/s. Micro Chem Products (India) Pvt. Ltd. liable to pay the demanded duty, interest, and penalty equal to the duty amount for using another person's brand name 'Micro' without disclosure, thus upholding the demand using the extended limitation period. The case underscores the significance of disclosing the use of another's brand name to prevent suppression allegations and the application of the extended limitation period in similar scenarios. en-us Tue, 10 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Aug 2012 12:13:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215944 The Revenue's appeal was allowed, and the cross-objection was dismissed. The Tribunal held M/s. Micro Chem Products (India) Pvt. Ltd. liable to pay the demanded duty, interest, and penalty equal to the duty amount for using another person's brand name 'Micro' without disclosure, thus upholding the demand using the extended limitation period. The case underscores the significance of disclosing the use of another's brand name to prevent suppression allegations and the application of the extended limitation period in similar scenarios. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 10 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215944