https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215941 Clandestine removal of excisable goods was upheld where seized records, private registers, stock and consumption data, loose slips and dispatch documents showed suppressed production and clearances. The statutory records were found not to reflect the true position, and the duty demand based on unaccounted raw material consumption and private records was sustained. The challenge was treated as a request to reappreciate evidence, but the concurrent factual findings were neither perverse nor affected by legal error or misreading of evidence. No substantial question of law arose, and the appeal failed. en-us Fri, 29 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Aug 2012 11:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215941 Clandestine removal of excisable goods was upheld where seized records, private registers, stock and consumption data, loose slips and dispatch documents showed suppressed production and clearances. The statutory records were found not to reflect the true position, and the duty demand based on unaccounted raw material consumption and private records was sustained. The challenge was treated as a request to reappreciate evidence, but the concurrent factual findings were neither perverse nor affected by legal error or misreading of evidence. No substantial question of law arose, and the appeal failed. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 29 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215941