https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215929 The Bombay High Court held that the Assessing Officer violated legal principles by passing an assessment order without communicating reasons for reopening and denying the opportunity to file objections. The Court quashed the assessment order, mandated the communication of reasons within two weeks, allowed the petitioner to file objections, and directed the Assessing Officer to dispose of objections promptly. A protective stay order was issued to ensure lawful proceedings and to avoid the limitation period. The Court emphasized the importance of specific communication of reasons to the assessee and kept all rights and contentions open in its decision. en-us Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Aug 2012 18:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215929 The Bombay High Court held that the Assessing Officer violated legal principles by passing an assessment order without communicating reasons for reopening and denying the opportunity to file objections. The Court quashed the assessment order, mandated the communication of reasons within two weeks, allowed the petitioner to file objections, and directed the Assessing Officer to dispose of objections promptly. A protective stay order was issued to ensure lawful proceedings and to avoid the limitation period. The Court emphasized the importance of specific communication of reasons to the assessee and kept all rights and contentions open in its decision. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215929