<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 599 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215916</link>
    <description>The appeal filed by the Revenue against the Commissioner (Appeals) order regarding duty payment on bio-compost clearance was rejected by the Appellate Tribunal, CESTAT, New Delhi. The Tribunal upheld its decision in a previous case involving E.I.D. Parry (India) Ltd., where a similar issue was decided in favor of the respondents, leading to the waiver of the penalty amount pre-deposit and setting aside the demand for bio-compost sale. Despite appeals in higher courts, as there was no stay on the Tribunal&#039;s order and the issue was previously decided in favor of the respondents, the Tribunal found no grounds to interfere with the Commissioner (Appeals) order, resulting in the allowance of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 18:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189300" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 599 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215916</link>
      <description>The appeal filed by the Revenue against the Commissioner (Appeals) order regarding duty payment on bio-compost clearance was rejected by the Appellate Tribunal, CESTAT, New Delhi. The Tribunal upheld its decision in a previous case involving E.I.D. Parry (India) Ltd., where a similar issue was decided in favor of the respondents, leading to the waiver of the penalty amount pre-deposit and setting aside the demand for bio-compost sale. Despite appeals in higher courts, as there was no stay on the Tribunal&#039;s order and the issue was previously decided in favor of the respondents, the Tribunal found no grounds to interfere with the Commissioner (Appeals) order, resulting in the allowance of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215916</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>