<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 592 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215909</link>
    <description>Section 68 additions were deleted where the assessee HUF substantiated long-term capital gains from share sales and no distinguishing material showed the transactions to be sham. Additions for low household withdrawals were sustained only to the extent already restricted on a reasonable appraisal of drawings and surrounding facts. A gift received by the HUF was treated as genuine because the donor&#039;s identity was established, the source of funds was explained through banked sale proceeds, and documentary support existed; in the absence of adverse evidence on creditworthiness or genuineness, the unexplained cash credit addition could not stand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2012 13:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189293" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 592 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215909</link>
      <description>Section 68 additions were deleted where the assessee HUF substantiated long-term capital gains from share sales and no distinguishing material showed the transactions to be sham. Additions for low household withdrawals were sustained only to the extent already restricted on a reasonable appraisal of drawings and surrounding facts. A gift received by the HUF was treated as genuine because the donor&#039;s identity was established, the source of funds was explained through banked sale proceeds, and documentary support existed; in the absence of adverse evidence on creditworthiness or genuineness, the unexplained cash credit addition could not stand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215909</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>