<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 579 - Rajasthan High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215896</link>
    <description>The addition of Rs. 22,41,482 on account of unexplained sundry creditors was deleted as the Commissioner and Tribunal found the Assessing Officer&#039;s actions lacking in proving the transactions as non-genuine. The disallowance of the claim of loss of Rs. 2,00,200 in the paddy account was also overturned due to fair market practices and the appellant providing sufficient evidence for the transactions. Both decisions favored the assessee, emphasizing the importance of evidence and fair market dealings, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 07:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189280" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 579 - Rajasthan High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215896</link>
      <description>The addition of Rs. 22,41,482 on account of unexplained sundry creditors was deleted as the Commissioner and Tribunal found the Assessing Officer&#039;s actions lacking in proving the transactions as non-genuine. The disallowance of the claim of loss of Rs. 2,00,200 in the paddy account was also overturned due to fair market practices and the appellant providing sufficient evidence for the transactions. Both decisions favored the assessee, emphasizing the importance of evidence and fair market dealings, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215896</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>