<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 569 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215886</link>
    <description>Extended limitation cannot be invoked where the assessee had disclosed the classification in advance, filed monthly returns and invoices, and produced a certificate supporting use of the goods on board a naval ship. On those facts, the material relevant to exemption was not concealed, so suppression with intent to evade duty was not established. The demand raised beyond the normal limitation period was therefore time barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2012 17:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189270" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 569 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215886</link>
      <description>Extended limitation cannot be invoked where the assessee had disclosed the classification in advance, filed monthly returns and invoices, and produced a certificate supporting use of the goods on board a naval ship. On those facts, the material relevant to exemption was not concealed, so suppression with intent to evade duty was not established. The demand raised beyond the normal limitation period was therefore time barred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215886</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>