<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 544 - Madras High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215861</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the writ appeals, confirming the orders allowing the writ petitions for refund of tax amounts with interest. The court upheld the decision based on the Karnataka High Court judgment and rejected the contention that the Chief Commissioner lacked the power to condone the delay. The appellants and respondents were directed to refund the amounts to the assessees concerned within a specified period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 11:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189245" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 544 - Madras High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215861</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the writ appeals, confirming the orders allowing the writ petitions for refund of tax amounts with interest. The court upheld the decision based on the Karnataka High Court judgment and rejected the contention that the Chief Commissioner lacked the power to condone the delay. The appellants and respondents were directed to refund the amounts to the assessees concerned within a specified period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215861</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>