<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 537 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215852</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, AHMEDABAD, granted the appellant&#039;s stay petition for the waiver of pre-deposit of confirmed amounts by authorities, related to cenvat credit on duty paid on inputs. Despite the appellant&#039;s failure to record input receipts in the RG 23A Part-1 register, the Tribunal accepted private records, including the inward register, stock register, production issue slips, and ledger accounts, as evidence of input receipt and consumption. The Tribunal emphasized statutory record-keeping requirements and the lack of contrary evidence from Revenue. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, acknowledging the appellant&#039;s proof of input receipt and utilization, overturning the initial order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 11:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189237" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 537 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215852</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, AHMEDABAD, granted the appellant&#039;s stay petition for the waiver of pre-deposit of confirmed amounts by authorities, related to cenvat credit on duty paid on inputs. Despite the appellant&#039;s failure to record input receipts in the RG 23A Part-1 register, the Tribunal accepted private records, including the inward register, stock register, production issue slips, and ledger accounts, as evidence of input receipt and consumption. The Tribunal emphasized statutory record-keeping requirements and the lack of contrary evidence from Revenue. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, acknowledging the appellant&#039;s proof of input receipt and utilization, overturning the initial order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215852</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>