<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 519 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215834</link>
    <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, a government company, regarding the levy of TDS under Section 194I of the Income Tax Act on transmission charges paid to MSETCL and PGCIL for electricity transmission. The ITAT held that the payments were not &quot;rent&quot; under Section 194I as they were for transmission services, not for the use of transmission lines. Consequently, the demands raised under Section 201(1) and Section 201(1A) were canceled, as the interest was deemed inapplicable due to the nature of the payments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2016 10:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189219" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 519 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215834</link>
      <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, a government company, regarding the levy of TDS under Section 194I of the Income Tax Act on transmission charges paid to MSETCL and PGCIL for electricity transmission. The ITAT held that the payments were not &quot;rent&quot; under Section 194I as they were for transmission services, not for the use of transmission lines. Consequently, the demands raised under Section 201(1) and Section 201(1A) were canceled, as the interest was deemed inapplicable due to the nature of the payments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215834</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>