<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 518 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215833</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, emphasizing the importance of proving the excessive or unreasonable nature of shared expenses before disallowing them under Section 40A(2)(a). The tribunal found no grounds to sustain any portion of the disallowance, ultimately allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal and dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2012 12:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189218" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 518 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215833</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, emphasizing the importance of proving the excessive or unreasonable nature of shared expenses before disallowing them under Section 40A(2)(a). The tribunal found no grounds to sustain any portion of the disallowance, ultimately allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal and dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215833</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>