<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 510 - ITAT, PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215825</link>
    <description>The ITAT, Pune upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision regarding the restriction of loss on the sale of securities for the assessment year 1993-94, in alignment with the Supreme Court&#039;s judgment. Additionally, the ITAT affirmed the Commissioner&#039;s allocation of common expenses for deduction under section 80I for old and new units at Pimpri, Pune for the assessment years 1993-94 and 1994-95, based on material consumed rather than sales. Consequently, the Revenue&#039;s appeals for both assessment years were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2012 13:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189210" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 510 - ITAT, PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215825</link>
      <description>The ITAT, Pune upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision regarding the restriction of loss on the sale of securities for the assessment year 1993-94, in alignment with the Supreme Court&#039;s judgment. Additionally, the ITAT affirmed the Commissioner&#039;s allocation of common expenses for deduction under section 80I for old and new units at Pimpri, Pune for the assessment years 1993-94 and 1994-95, based on material consumed rather than sales. Consequently, the Revenue&#039;s appeals for both assessment years were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215825</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>