<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 503 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215818</link>
    <description>The Karnataka High Court determined that the dispute regarding the classification of services as &quot;Consulting Engineer Service&quot; and the jurisdictional issue fell under the purview of the Apex Court. As a result, the High Court held that it lacked the authority to decide on the classification matter and rejected the appeal, instructing the revenue to pursue the case with the Apex Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 17:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189203" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 503 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215818</link>
      <description>The Karnataka High Court determined that the dispute regarding the classification of services as &quot;Consulting Engineer Service&quot; and the jurisdictional issue fell under the purview of the Apex Court. As a result, the High Court held that it lacked the authority to decide on the classification matter and rejected the appeal, instructing the revenue to pursue the case with the Apex Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215818</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>