<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 500 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215815</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, overturning the rejection of refund claims for Service Tax paid on services consumed within the SEZ. The rejection based on lack of nexus with authorized operations and service tax on services wholly consumed within the SEZ was deemed legally incorrect. The Tribunal emphasized the entitlement to refunds under relevant legal provisions, including exemptions within SEZs, and granted consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2014 15:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189200" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 500 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215815</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, overturning the rejection of refund claims for Service Tax paid on services consumed within the SEZ. The rejection based on lack of nexus with authorized operations and service tax on services wholly consumed within the SEZ was deemed legally incorrect. The Tribunal emphasized the entitlement to refunds under relevant legal provisions, including exemptions within SEZs, and granted consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215815</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>