<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 471 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215786</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that while there was a delay in payment and filing of returns, the penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was not warranted. Instead, the appellants were held liable to pay a penalty under Rule 27 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. A penalty of Rs. 5,000 was imposed under Rule 27, to be adjusted against the previously paid penalty and excess interest amount. The appeal was partly allowed with consequential relief, clarifying the imposition of penalties based on the case&#039;s circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 17:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189172" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 471 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215786</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that while there was a delay in payment and filing of returns, the penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was not warranted. Instead, the appellants were held liable to pay a penalty under Rule 27 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. A penalty of Rs. 5,000 was imposed under Rule 27, to be adjusted against the previously paid penalty and excess interest amount. The appeal was partly allowed with consequential relief, clarifying the imposition of penalties based on the case&#039;s circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215786</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>