<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 465 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215780</link>
    <description>Shares held as a long-term investment were treated as a capital asset under section 2(14). Capital gains on transfer by a Mauritius resident were not chargeable to tax in India because the more beneficial India-Mauritius DTAA applied, supported by a valid tax residency certificate and Article 13(4). The transfer nevertheless constituted an international transaction, so transfer pricing provisions under sections 92 to 92F applied. No withholding tax obligation arose under section 195 because the gains were not taxable in India, but a return of income remained required under section 139. Section 115JB was also held applicable where its statutory conditions were met.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2012 13:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189166" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 465 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215780</link>
      <description>Shares held as a long-term investment were treated as a capital asset under section 2(14). Capital gains on transfer by a Mauritius resident were not chargeable to tax in India because the more beneficial India-Mauritius DTAA applied, supported by a valid tax residency certificate and Article 13(4). The transfer nevertheless constituted an international transaction, so transfer pricing provisions under sections 92 to 92F applied. No withholding tax obligation arose under section 195 because the gains were not taxable in India, but a return of income remained required under section 139. Section 115JB was also held applicable where its statutory conditions were met.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215780</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>