<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 463 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215778</link>
    <description>The Revenue appealed against the Tribunal&#039;s decision granting the benefit of Section 80IC to the Baddi unit without adjusting losses from Delhi units. The ITAT upheld the independent treatment of each unit for deduction purposes under Section 80IA and 80IC, based on relevant court precedents. The Court affirmed the ITAT&#039;s decision, emphasizing separate treatment of units and the Assessing Officer&#039;s discretion in carrying forward losses. The appeal was dismissed as no substantial legal question arose, maintaining consistency with past rulings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 11:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189164" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 463 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215778</link>
      <description>The Revenue appealed against the Tribunal&#039;s decision granting the benefit of Section 80IC to the Baddi unit without adjusting losses from Delhi units. The ITAT upheld the independent treatment of each unit for deduction purposes under Section 80IA and 80IC, based on relevant court precedents. The Court affirmed the ITAT&#039;s decision, emphasizing separate treatment of units and the Assessing Officer&#039;s discretion in carrying forward losses. The appeal was dismissed as no substantial legal question arose, maintaining consistency with past rulings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215778</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>