<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 462 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215777</link>
    <description>Interest under Sections 234B and 234C was held not leviable where the assessee&#039;s income was subjected to tax deduction at source, following the Court&#039;s earlier binding decision. The assessee&#039;s consistent item-wise valuation of closing stock at cost or market price, whichever was lower, was upheld because it reflected true business profit and the Revenue&#039;s average-cost method would have produced an estimated and distorted stock value. The Court found the concurrent factual findings neither arbitrary nor perverse, so no substantial question of law arose. The appeal was therefore dismissed in full.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 14:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189163" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 462 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215777</link>
      <description>Interest under Sections 234B and 234C was held not leviable where the assessee&#039;s income was subjected to tax deduction at source, following the Court&#039;s earlier binding decision. The assessee&#039;s consistent item-wise valuation of closing stock at cost or market price, whichever was lower, was upheld because it reflected true business profit and the Revenue&#039;s average-cost method would have produced an estimated and distorted stock value. The Court found the concurrent factual findings neither arbitrary nor perverse, so no substantial question of law arose. The appeal was therefore dismissed in full.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215777</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>