https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215771 The Tribunal partially allowed the appellant's appeal, remanding both issues for fresh consideration by the Assessing Officer. The first issue regarding the unexplained investment of Rs. 3,01,000 was remanded due to the Tribunal admitting additional evidence to substantiate the source of funds from a disclosed bank account. The second issue concerning the addition of Rs. 84,000 on account of low withdrawal was also remanded as discrepancies in the estimation of household expenses and lack of opportunity for the appellant to address the Inspector's report were noted. en-us Fri, 29 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Aug 2012 18:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215771 The Tribunal partially allowed the appellant's appeal, remanding both issues for fresh consideration by the Assessing Officer. The first issue regarding the unexplained investment of Rs. 3,01,000 was remanded due to the Tribunal admitting additional evidence to substantiate the source of funds from a disclosed bank account. The second issue concerning the addition of Rs. 84,000 on account of low withdrawal was also remanded as discrepancies in the estimation of household expenses and lack of opportunity for the appellant to address the Inspector's report were noted. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 29 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215771