<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 452 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215767</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT, Mumbai considered the treatment of the sale of shares as bogus capital gain and undisclosed income under section 68, including the addition of commission for arranging capital gains in penny stocks. The tribunal disagreed with the Assessing Officer and CIT (A), emphasizing the need to establish specific bogus transactions. It directed a detailed examination by the AO, cross-examination of relevant persons, independent inquiries, and providing the assessee with an opportunity before deciding the issue. The tribunal set aside the previous decisions and allowed the appeal for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 17:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189153" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 452 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215767</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT, Mumbai considered the treatment of the sale of shares as bogus capital gain and undisclosed income under section 68, including the addition of commission for arranging capital gains in penny stocks. The tribunal disagreed with the Assessing Officer and CIT (A), emphasizing the need to establish specific bogus transactions. It directed a detailed examination by the AO, cross-examination of relevant persons, independent inquiries, and providing the assessee with an opportunity before deciding the issue. The tribunal set aside the previous decisions and allowed the appeal for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215767</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>