<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 446 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215761</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed to the extent that redemption fine and penalty for items exceeding the initial penalty amount were not restored to the initial amounts, ensuring adherence to the Tribunal&#039;s order on the assessed value of goods. The judgment provided consequential relief as per law, addressing the issues of appeal against refund claim rejection and interpretation of the Tribunal&#039;s order on redemption fine and penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 12:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189147" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 446 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215761</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed to the extent that redemption fine and penalty for items exceeding the initial penalty amount were not restored to the initial amounts, ensuring adherence to the Tribunal&#039;s order on the assessed value of goods. The judgment provided consequential relief as per law, addressing the issues of appeal against refund claim rejection and interpretation of the Tribunal&#039;s order on redemption fine and penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215761</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>