<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 421 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215736</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals in part for the assessment years 1998-99 and 1999-2000, remanding certain issues back to the AO for fresh consideration. The department&#039;s appeal for the assessment year 1998-99 was allowed in part, while the appeal for 1999-2000 was rejected. The Tribunal held that disallowance of advertisement and repair expenses was not justified, and adjustments in computation of deduction under section 80HHC were required.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 20:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189122" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 421 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215736</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals in part for the assessment years 1998-99 and 1999-2000, remanding certain issues back to the AO for fresh consideration. The department&#039;s appeal for the assessment year 1998-99 was allowed in part, while the appeal for 1999-2000 was rejected. The Tribunal held that disallowance of advertisement and repair expenses was not justified, and adjustments in computation of deduction under section 80HHC were required.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215736</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>