<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 412 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215727</link>
    <description>The Court found the application seeking cancellation of a property sale and alternative relief not maintainable as the applicant did not object during the sale confirmation proceedings, making the order binding. The Court advised pursuing other legal remedies or seeking relief from the Official Liquidator.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2012 15:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189113" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 412 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215727</link>
      <description>The Court found the application seeking cancellation of a property sale and alternative relief not maintainable as the applicant did not object during the sale confirmation proceedings, making the order binding. The Court advised pursuing other legal remedies or seeking relief from the Official Liquidator.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215727</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>