<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 406 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215721</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the department&#039;s appeal against the Order-in-Appeal, affirming the Commissioner (Appeals) decision to allow the refund claim for various services except Air Travel Agent service. The Tribunal determined that the Commissioner&#039;s order was not a remand and upheld the refund eligibility. The department&#039;s argument based on a Supreme Court case was deemed inapplicable, as the original authority had already complied with the Commissioner&#039;s directive. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed, confirming the refund for the services in question.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2012 14:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189107" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 406 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215721</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the department&#039;s appeal against the Order-in-Appeal, affirming the Commissioner (Appeals) decision to allow the refund claim for various services except Air Travel Agent service. The Tribunal determined that the Commissioner&#039;s order was not a remand and upheld the refund eligibility. The department&#039;s argument based on a Supreme Court case was deemed inapplicable, as the original authority had already complied with the Commissioner&#039;s directive. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed, confirming the refund for the services in question.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215721</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>