<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 387 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215702</link>
    <description>Where an assessee produced confirmations, bank statements, income-tax particulars and the creditors were examined on oath, the initial burden under section 68 stood discharged by showing identity of the creditors, genuineness of the loan transactions and their creditworthiness. The loans were routed through account payee cheques, the assessee maintained regular books, and the trade results were not disturbed. In these circumstances, requiring proof of the source of deposits in the creditors&#039; bank accounts amounted to insisting on proof of source of source, which was not warranted absent material showing that the assessee&#039;s own unaccounted money had been routed through those accounts. The addition under section 68 was therefore deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 17:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189088" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 387 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215702</link>
      <description>Where an assessee produced confirmations, bank statements, income-tax particulars and the creditors were examined on oath, the initial burden under section 68 stood discharged by showing identity of the creditors, genuineness of the loan transactions and their creditworthiness. The loans were routed through account payee cheques, the assessee maintained regular books, and the trade results were not disturbed. In these circumstances, requiring proof of the source of deposits in the creditors&#039; bank accounts amounted to insisting on proof of source of source, which was not warranted absent material showing that the assessee&#039;s own unaccounted money had been routed through those accounts. The addition under section 68 was therefore deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215702</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>