<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 385 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215700</link>
    <description>The penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was deemed not leviable as the additional income voluntarily declared could not be considered concealed income without concrete evidence. The Tribunal emphasized procedural irregularities and the lack of evidence for concealment, leading to the penalty being deleted and the appeal of the assessee being allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 16:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=189086" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 385 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215700</link>
      <description>The penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was deemed not leviable as the additional income voluntarily declared could not be considered concealed income without concrete evidence. The Tribunal emphasized procedural irregularities and the lack of evidence for concealment, leading to the penalty being deleted and the appeal of the assessee being allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215700</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>